After spending considerable time developing and refining a sanctuary seating plan that meets the goals of the entire building committee, a sub-committee directed us to relocate the stage to the corner.
I spent half a day making this work in the computer so occupancy, exiting and row/aisle locations all worked.
In the end we got 70 extra chairs to fit. Success?
No.
While there are indeed 70 additional seats....there are actually 90 less "good" seats, if defined as 8 or less rows from the only 14" high existing platform.
Further, the first 2-4 rows in this new plan only accommodate between 2 and 4 folks sitting together!
They must now also build a back-wall, build two additional odd shaped stairs to behind the stage storage, as well as infill a triangle of space between the existing ramp and stage = $$$$ they don't have access to now.
There is no formal center aisle for weddings.
Overflow seating in the fellowship has half the visibility of the alter.
The ceiling lighting will have to be switched in a staggered fashion rather than front/middle/back creating distractions.
There are also 40 extra seats now under the existing lower ceiling.
Finally, in the original plan almost every seating row could exit to the left or right, and walk around the perimeter to find a seat or leave mid-sermon with minimal distraction to others.
Architects design for a reason. I have yet to have a "new" idea introduced after a solid design process that was actually better than the current solution.
A wasted day?
NO!
The congregation now has a seating layout that permits them to "pack them in" on Easter and Christmas, delaying the need for a third service and stalling the need for phase 2....a doubling of this sanctuary in 3-5 years.
Current plan:
Proposed Plan:
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPhone
Location:Elk River, MN
No comments:
Post a Comment